See Comments down arrow

A plan, you're right, we'll need a plan

04 May 2022 | News Roundup

When you listen to people like Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau describing the shimmering emerald-green economy to which they are leading us, you can practically smell the milk and honey wafting over Jordan. So who needs some boring old Auditor General going um guys it’s all just rock and sand in every direction? Alas, it turns out we do, because once again the people who have consistently boasted of the promised land just ahead have consistently also failed to address any of practical difficulties that ensure we will never get there.

The top finding in the study is a model of clarity, unless you’re its target: “The federal government was not prepared to support a just transition to a low-carbon economy.” And when these guys don’t prepare, they leave no stone turned. For instance, among “Key Facts and Figures” was “Under Budget 2019, Natural Resources Canada was mandated to lead the reporting on results of the activities implemented to support a just transition for the affected workers and communities. However, we found that this had not been done.”

Oops. But fortunately the all-purpose solution is ready to hand: an interdepartmental committee.

“To enable a coordinated approach to planning and implementing a just transition for Canadians, Natural Resources Canada, with the support of Employment and Social Development Canada, should formalize a governance structure to ensure that all relevant federal departments and agencies have clear roles, responsibilities, and accountabilities for advancing the federal support for a just transition to a low-carbon economy.”

Although if they could walk that way, we wouldn’t still be wandering in the desert, would we?

It is curious the faith people now place in a “whole-of-government” approach. Sure, it sounds holistic, gung-ho and determined. But what does it actually mean? That a vast, sprawling, infamously inefficient organization, and we don’t mean just the current Canadian government but government since the invention of the memo if not before, an organization whose individual parts are notoriously for their capacity to delay, waste, misplace, misunderstand and bloviate will somehow be made to work together seamlessly by… by… by what? What is this new addition to this rickety structure?

In the hilarious British 1980s sitcom “Yes Minister,” the bumbling politician Jim Hacker and the slick bureaucrat Sir Humphrey Appleby were in charge of precisely such an outfit, the Department of Administrative Affairs. It was meant to be satire in keeping with G.K. Chesterton’s dictum now a century old that the opposite of funny isn’t “serious,” it’s “not funny”. But apparently that joke, like nearly every other one in the series, is lost on the solemn dolts now in charge. (Who, in unrelated news, just sunk a billion tax dollars in a new agency to foster innovation, undaunted by being unable to get their own payroll software to work over the past six years).

Again we quote from the just transition “Audit at a Glance” since actually reading long boring reports gets in the way of high-minded rhetoric about how all you need is love.

“Natural Resources Canada, the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, and Prairies Economic Development Canada, with the support of Employment and Social Development Canada, should work together to measure, monitor, and report on just-transition outcomes. This would include

* establishing indicators and determining data requirements to measure and monitor the long-term effects of the coal phase-out on affected workers and communities/

* tracking progress against indicators that align with the Canadian Indicator Framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and reflect the diversity of directly and indirectly affected workers and communities

* establishing results to be achieved for workers and communities that support a just transition to a low-carbon economy

* establishing a reporting schedule to publicly report on the outcomes of the just-transition programs”.

Just that? Sure. No problem. Um as soon as we get our budget deficit projections within 50% and our inflation guesses to within a factor of two, we’ll work out mathematically precise, rigorously accurate measures of social as well as economic well-being. Would you like decimal places with your social justice? And this is auditors talking.

As for public reporting, in the full “List of Recommendations” the suggestion is that NRC and ESDC should perform an efficient justice miracle including

“* outline the federal government’s approach to supporting a just transition to a low‑carbon economy

* develop an engagement strategy that includes key stakeholders that represent the diversity of affected workers and communities

* review the federal programming to determine how existing federal policies and programs can contribute to a just transition for workers and communities

* undertake a gap analysis to determine which policies and programs should be scaled up to support a just transition”.

And the response of the government was: “Agreed. Action to deliver on this recommendation is underway, under the leadership of Natural Resources Canada and Employment and Social Development Canada.”

Not yeah we’re in a mess and will straighten things out. A slippery claim that the indictment, while true, is in fact false because we secretly already fixed it. Which is typical, and is accompanied by a bunch more soothing gooblahoy about how they’ll “continue” to do stuff the Auditor General just rebuked them for not doing and which they have no more idea how to do than they have how to achieve unaided human flight.

In fact every agency agrees with every recommendation while insisting that it’s no longer needed. Which sadly is more evidence that the Auditor General has no idea how to tell departments they’re totally out to lunch and departments have no idea how to figure it out. Which means fixing it may take a little while. Especially since the people at the top have no idea that it matters. Just imagine there’s no problem. It’s easy if you give it a whole-of-government try.

4 comments on “A plan, you're right, we'll need a plan”

  1. So, I'm not the only one who immediately thought of the Department of Administrative Affairs

  2. Clearly, I need to go back and watch 'Yes Minister' and 'Yes Prime Minister' all over again.
    The real joke of course is that many UK politicians asked at the time, about the programme didn't say, "Oh yes it's funny, but government isn't really like that you know."
    No, what they said was, "Bang on, watching it is just like being in Parliament."
    And so it goes on with Boris's Net Zero Carbon (dioxide).
    I bet he wished he could claim 'Net Zero kids that I don't even know about.'

  3. I am sure that the era of the "Horse and Buggy" are on their way back and then those who disclaimed their parents walked five miles to school and back will be able to tell their grandchildren they also did. Not because they wanted too, but because their Gov't decided that getting rid of their abundant energy was somehow going to make everything better.
    Trust in the Federal Gov't is fast waining and those who think...an emphasis on "thinking ", should see the direction that the Globalist supporting Trudeau is heading. And we will be happy owning nothing and hold our hands out to the powers that be for the food and clothes upon our backs.
    Did anyone see the article on the biggest oil discovery in the world?
    As for Trudeau with his defiance of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms of ordinary Canadians, his time is marked as any sort of a leader at all.
    As for the CO2 debate, CO2 has always been around and even more abundant in the past then now, but we have to pay carbon tax so our tax dollars can be squandered.
    Just Sayin'

  4. I would go back a little earlier and recall the Ministry of Silly Walks which applies to dozens of ministries that have been added to leviathan in order to deliver that "Just Society" that was promised by an earlier Trudeau and instead delivered Justin.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *