This claim is like someone saying when you’re lost in the woods you shouldn’t waste time debating which way to go before starting to run. If the “action” being proposed wasn't so costly and harmful we might not need to debate it. But when activists say the science requires we just stop asking questions and go ahead with policies that could plunge millions into brutal poverty or trap them there, and we find after carefully looking into the matter that the science doesn’t say what they claim, we should certainly not just give in and let them set the agenda because they’re shouting in a panic.